To ITC Home Page

A Compendium of On-Line Soil Survey Information

Bibliography

===================================================
Home
To the Index

PageTop Digital bibliographies

These may save you some work entering your citations in papers. Also, you can search for works of interest. Warning! These are provided as-is. I am not a reference librarian nor a professional abstracting service, so I do not guarantee that all the citations are perfect. As always, you are responsible for finding the source and reading it yourself. Please e-mail me with any corrections.

PageTop On-line bibliographies

Search on-line for soil survey related topics.

PageTop CD-ROM

These can help you build up a bibliography. Ask your library to buy them.

PageTop Texts

  1. Dent, D. & Young, A. 1981. Soil survey and land evaluation. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Still the only English-language text on these subjects. A refreshing, straight-forward and non-ideological presentation.

  2. Buol, S. W., F. D. Hole, McCracken, R.J. & Southard, R. J. 1997. Soil genesis and classification. Ames, IA, The Iowa State University Press.

    By far the best explanation of how soils form on the landscape. Emphasizes geographic aspects; organized around USDA Soil Taxonomy.

  3. Davidson, D.A. 1992. The evaluation of land resources. Harlow: Longman Scientific & Technical.

    An accessible and well-written book on methods to evaluate land. It includes a good description of what the land evaluator can extract from soil maps.

  4. Ruellan, A. & Dosso, M. 1993. Regards sur le sol. Paris: Foucher.

    A truly beautiful effort to communicate to the general public how soils occur on landscapes. Available in French, English, Portuguese, and Spanish.

PageTop Journals

I've only listed journals with on-line content, either abstracts or full articles, and which publish papers directly related to soil survey.

PageTop General thoughts on Soil Survey

  1. Byrd, H. 1991. Speaking out on soil survey (letter to the editor). Soil Survey Horizons 32, 126-127.
  2. Zinck , J.A. 1990. Soil survey: epistemology of a vital discipline. ITC Journal 1990-4: 335-351.

    Zinck's inaugural address as Professor of Soil Survey at ITC.

  3. Hudson, B.D. 1992. The soil survey as paradigm-based science. Soil Science Society of American Journal 56, 836-841.

    This has been heavily criticized, but has had some influence in the USA.

PageTop Techniques

  1. Avery, B.W. 1987. Soil survey methods: a review. Technical Monograph No. 18 Soil Survey & Land Resource Centre, Silsoe.
  2.   USDA Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil Survey Manual. USDA Handbook 18. Washington, DC.

    Standard practices in the USA. Also available in Web format

  3. McKenzie, N. J., P. E. Gessler, Ryan, P. J., & O'Connell, D. A. 2000. The role of terrain analysis in soil mapping. Pages 245-265 In: "Terrain analysis : principles and applications", edited by J. P. Wilson & J. Gallant. New York, Wiley & Sons

    Summarizes the very active research in automated soil mapping from terrain attributes.

  4. Bibliography for Predictive Soil Modeling

    Excellent reading list, from Karen Holmes of Soil Science Research Group, UCSB

  5. Reybold, W.U. & Petersen, G.W. (ed.) 1987. Soil survey techniques. SSSA Special Publication Number 20 Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, WI.

    This includes some interesting papers on new (in 1987) techniques:

    1. Doolittle, J.A. 1987. Using ground-penetrating radar to increase the quality and efficiency of soil surveys. pp. 11-32.
    2. Grossman, R.B. & Pringle, F.B. 1987. Describing surface soil properties - their seasonal changes and implications for management. pp. 57-75.
    3. Horvath, E.H., Fosnight, E.A., Klingebiel, A.A., Moore, D.G. & Stone, J.E. 1987. Using a spatial and tabular database to generate statistics from terrain and spectral data for soil surveys. pp. 91-98.
    4. Klingebiel, A.A., Horvath, E.H., Moore, D.G. & Reybold, W.U. 1987. Use of slope, aspect and elevation maps derived from digital elevation model data in making soil surveys. pp. 77-90.

PageTop Accuracy & Quality Control

  1. In the early 1970's the Oxford group published an excellent set of papers on soil survey technqiues, focusing on cost-effectiveness. Their basic idea was that soil survey should be judged on its usefulness to its various users.
    1. Bie, S.W. & Beckett, P.H.T. 1971. Quality control in soil survey. Introduction: I. The choice of mapping unit. Journal of Soil Science 22, 32-49.
    2. Bie, S.W. & Beckett, P.H.T. 1971. Quality control in soil survey. II. The costs of soil survey. Journal of Soil Science 22, 453-465.
    3. Burrough, P.A., Beckett, P.H.T. & Jarvis, M.G. 1971. The relation between cost & utility in soil survey (I-III). Journal of Soil Science 22, 359-394.
    4. Beckett, P.H.T. & Burrough, P.A. 1971. The relation between cost & utility in soil survey. IV. Comparison of the utilities of soil maps produced by different survey procedures, and to different scales. Journal of Soil Science 22, 466-480.
    5. Beckett, P.H.T. & Burrough, P.A. 1971. The relation between cost & utility in soil survey. V. The cost-effectiveness of different soil survey procedures. Journal of Soil Science 22, 481-489.
    6. Bie, S.W. & Ulph, A. 1972. The economic value of survey information. Journal of Agricultural Economics 13, 285-297.
    7. Bie, S.W., Uph, A. & Beckett, P.H.T. 1973. Calculating the economic benefits of soil survey. Journal of Soil Science 24, 429-435.
  2. Forbes, T.R., Rossiter, D. & Van Wambeke, A. 1982. Guidelines for evaluating the adequacy of soil resource inventories, 1987 printing ed. SMSS Technical Monograph #4 Cornell University Department of Agronomy, Ithaca, NY.

    A straightforward methdology to determine whether a published survey meets the needs of a particular user. It divides adequacy into four parts:

    On-line version PDF (9.64 Mb)

    1. Map scale: "Is the soils map legible, and, in particular, can it legibly represent the smallest land area of interest to the soil resource inventory user?"
    2. Legend: "Does the soils map convey sufficient information on the properties of the mapped land?"
    3. Location accuracy: "Can points and areas be accurately located on the ground or on the map?"
    4. Ground truth: "How reliable is the map? Does the representation of the soilscape presented by the map accurately reflect the true soilscape?"

    This was written before GPS, inertial navigation systems, and widely-available GIS and georeferenced remote sensing.

  3. de Gruijter, J.J. & Marsman, B.A. 1984. Transect sampling for reliable information on mapping units. Soil spatial variability: proceedings of a workshop of the ISSS and SSSA, Las Vegas, 150-163.
  4. van Reeuwijk, L.P. van (ed.). 1998? Guidelines for Quality Management in Soil & Plant Laboratories. ISRIC/FAO.

PageTop Published Soil Surveys

  1.   Eyk, J J van der, MacVicar, C N, & Villiers, J M de. 1969. Soils of the Tugela Basin: a study in subtropical Africa. Natal (Republic of South Africa): Town & Regional Planning Comission.

    An outstanding report, and an example of a survey aimed squarely at regional planning.

PageTop

Author: D G Rossiter URL: http://www.itc.nl/personal/rossiter/research/rsrch_ss_biblio.html
E-Mail: rossiter@itc.nl Last Updated: 2010_012
Valid HTML 4.0! Disclaimer